Earthing Sponsor

Shop Earthing.com

Tuesday, October 25, 2016

No, the Universe Is Not Expanding at an Accelerated Rate, Physicists Say

Image Source.

(Stillness in the Storm Editor) The expansion of the universe at an ever-increasing rate was a theory first proposed in the 1990s and is currently pushed through the media as accepted fact. But like many of the scientific theories floating around in our world today—as promulgated by propaganda networks like The Science Channel—there is no observed evidence to support this conjecture. 



The article below details a study recently conducted by Oxford University that observed Type Ia supernovae suggesting that the universe is actually expanding at a constant rate. Data gathered deflates the theory that "dark energy" exists in the universe. Since the universe isn't expanding at an accelerated rate there is no need to suppose that some mysterious source of energy exists. 

Dark energy, like dark matter, has never been observed and is an invention to account for misperception—at least this is what many non-conforming cosmologists believe. Electric Universe proponents are especially keen on debunking many of the fallacies rife within cosmology today, dark energy and matter being among them. 

Speaking as someone who has a background in science and has studied physics, I can personally say that there is an unacknowledged problem insofar as confusing model with reality that touches nearly every aspect of scientific study. Modeling is the process by which mathematics is used to illustrate a theory and should always be guided by observation. But in the late 19th century, science began to confuse representations with reality, and since then whole schools of thought have emerged based purely on conjecture, brandished as fact to the public and students alike. 

This recent study is yet another example showing that as outsiders—those of us who lack the time or personal skills to understand these things individually—we must not place our faith blindly in the priesthood of science, sometimes called scientism. 

Related Peer Review Hoax Exposed-60 Faked Papers Discovered In Accepted Science

- Justin

Source - Futurism

by Dom Galeon, October 23rd 2016

A new study out of Oxford University is questioning the accelerated expansion theory that says dark energy is driving the expansion of the universe. According to the study, accelerated expansion theories are based on an unobserved model, opening up the possibilities to new theories on our expanding universe.



The theory the universe has been expanding at an increasing rate, first proposed in the late 1990s, is now facing a new round of criticism by a team of scientists from Oxford University’s Department of Physics.

The theory of an accelerated expansion was developed by analyzing Type Ia supernovae (thermonuclear explosion of dying stars) via the Hubble Space Telescope. It put a strange substance called dark energy — the alleged driver of this accelerated expansion — into the limelight.

Now, the Oxford team led by Professor Subir Sarkar, a fellow at the Neils Bohr Institute, is challenging this Nobel-winning idea. After analyzing a catalog of 740 Type Ia supernovae, ten times more than the original 1990s sample size, the researchers said the accelerated expansion theory falls short of scientific accuracy, according to the study published in Scientific Reports.

“The evidence for accelerated expansion is, at most, what physicists call ‘3 sigma’,” Sukar said, according to Phys.org. “This is far short of the ‘5 sigma’ standard required to claim a discovery of fundamental significance.”

Sarkar said other evidence suggesting an accelerating universe, like the cosmic microwave background, were all made under the framework of an assumed and unobserved model.

CHALLENGING PREVIOUS ASSUMPTIONS

The research shows data more consistent with the theory of expansion at a constant rate. It’s a bold claim, one that questions many of the theories we currently hold about the nature of the universe, including what we know about dark energy (which is already so little, to begin with).

Expansion simulation. Credits: Heitmann et. al.

“A more sophisticated theoretical framework accounting for the observation that the universe is not exactly homogeneous and that its matter content may not behave as an ideal gas — two key assumptions of standard cosmology — may well be able to account for all observations without requiring dark energy,” Sarkar said, according to Phys.org.

Such is the way of science: Theories are created and new theories are formed as a result of better technology and fresher data.

found on Suspicious0bservers
_________________________
Stillness in the Storm Editor's note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Do you think this article needs a correction or update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at sitsshow@gmail.comThank you for reading.
_________

Source:

http://futurism.com/no-the-universe-is-not-expanding-at-an-accelerated-rate-physicists-say/
________________________________________________________________
Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation? 
Answer -- The primary goal of Stillness in the Storm is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process. 

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle

The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views Stillness in the Storm, the authors who contribute to it, or those who follow it. 

View and Share our Images
Curious about Stillness in the Storm? 
See our About this blog - Contact Us page.

If it was not for the gallant support of readers, we could not devote so much energy into continuing this blog. We greatly appreciate any support you provide!

We hope you benefit from this not-for-profit site 

It takes hours of work every day to maintain, write, edit, research, illustrate and publish this blog. We have been greatly empowered by our search for the truth, and the work of other researchers. We hope our efforts 
to give back, with this website, helps others in gaining 
knowledge, liberation and empowerment.

"There are only two mistakes one can make along the road to truth; 
not going all the way, and not starting." — Buddha

If you find our work of value, consider making a Contribution.
This website is supported by readers like you. 

[Click on Image below to Contribute]

Support Stillness in the Storm

Sign up for Gaia TV

Sign up for Gaia TV
By signing up through this link you also support SITS