Sunday, May 15, 2016

"Earth's magnetic field shouldn't exist" – Russian scientists reveal Earth's magnetism is more mysterious than ever

Image Source.
The first article in this series discusses theories developed as a result of a 2012 model that the Earth's mantle conducts heat too well to produce convection currents capable of generating a strong magnetic field.

The earlier 2012 finding seemed to disprove the traditional theory of the magnetosphere being generated as a result of swirling liquid iron within the outer-core of Earth's interior.

A study from 2015 appeared to solve the convection problem (discussed in the first article) and restore the traditional theory's validity. But the second article in this posting discusses a recent Russian study from 2016 which disproved the 2015 theory. Since the publication of the Russia study, the team that produced the 2015 theory has since retracted their paper.

The bottomline: Scientists are more baffled than ever about what causes the Earth's magnetic field. 

An alternative theory is supplied by the Reciprocal Systems theory, linked below. It suggests a different yet plausible explanation for, not only the Earth's magnetic field, but also a great many other mysterious observations, such as the apparent expansion of the Earth.

Related The Energetic Evolution of The Solar System | At the Earth's Core: The Geophysics of Planetary Evolution

- Justin

Source - Live Science

Crashing Electrons Could Explain Earth's Magnetic Field Mystery

by Becky Oskin

A messy paradox that has plagued geoscientists who study Earth's core and the magnetic field it produces may now be solved.

The puzzle is only a few years old. It was raised in a 2012 paper in which geophysicists in the United Kingdom published a widely accepted supercomputer model that found Earth's iron core was incredibly efficient at conducting heat. In conduction, heat moves, but the material transferring the heat stays still — think of a kitchen pan warming up. The transfer of the heat from the stovetop to the pan is conduction.

In that study, the researchers examined how heat may move through the Earth's core, at the level of atoms and electrons. Put simply, the paradox is that in this model, so much heat escaped from the core via conduction that there wasn't enough energy left over to fuel convection (when heat creates motion) in the liquid outer core. The implication: Earth's magnetic field shouldn't exist. (If kitchen pans were as effective at conducting heat as the core, then meat would never cook because all the heat would escape into the air.)

"The study attracted a lot of attention because of the serious consequences," said Bruce Buffett, a geophysicist at the University of California, Berkeley, who was not involved in the research.

But now, new research finds that inside the deep Earth, where temperatures can match those on the surface of the sun, iron's electrons move heat by more means than just the usual way, through rapid vibrations, according to a study published today (Jan. 28) in the journal Nature. Electrons also bash into one another, transferring energy through collisions known as electron-electron scattering. [What Is Earth Made Of?]

The results resolve the paradox, the researchers concluded in the new paper. "There was a big problem in how you generate a magnetic field, and now, because of our results, that problem has basically gone away," said study co-author Ron Cohen, a staff scientist at the Carnegie Institution for Science in Washington, D.C., and a professor at University College London in the United Kingdom.

Shiver and shake

Lead study author Peng Zhang, also of the Carnegie Institution, used a National Science Foundation supercomputer to calculate how iron's electrons zip and zwing within the core. The modeling work is akin to predicting to position of every water droplet in a rain cloud, Cohen said. "We're worrying about where every single electron is, and how they interact and scatter and bounce off each other," Cohen told Live Science.

The Earth's inner core is solid, and about the size of the moon. The outer core is liquid; about 1,400 miles (2,250 kilometers) thick; and topped by 1,800 miles (2,900 km) of crystalline mantle that flows like warm plastic. This is all encased in a cold, hard shell of rock called the crust. The core is not pure iron metal — elements such as oxygen, carbon and nickel are also present.

An artist's conception of Earth's core overlain by
the electronic structure of iron.Credit: Ronald Cohen

Zhang's team discovered that in the core, collisions between electrons are as important as collisions between electrons and vibrating atoms (known as electron-phonon scattering) when it comes to heat energy. The earlier modeling work, also published in Nature, had concluded that the Earth's core is losing two to three times as much heat to conduction than previously thought. Zhang's new findings put the amount of lost heat back in line with conventional models (because accounting for the electron-electron collisions gives iron a lower conductivity).

Laboratory experiments can determine whether the team's model is correct, Cohen said.

"These calculations are difficult, as are the experiments, but confirmation of these results will be important," said Dave Stevenson, a geophysicist at the California Institute of Technology who was not involved in either study. However, he said, it is not yet clear that the new results overturn the earlier findings from 2012.

"Science is never that simple," Stevenson said. And the new study won't solve all the questions that remain, such as how the Earth actually cooled throughout its history, Stevenson said.

Protecting the planet

Since the 2012 model was published, geoscientists have come up with alternate explanations for how Earth's magnetic field may work,under the premise that most heat was escaping through conduction. The planet's magnetic field has existed for at least 3.4 billion years, according to magnetic minerals in ancient rocks.

Convection is when heat creates motion. Heat from below causes material to rise, and as the material cools, it falls back down again — just like you see in a pot of boiling water or when all the hot air in a room collects near the ceiling. Scientists think that convection currents in the core's liquid metal may flow in spirals due to Earth's constant rotation. The spiraling metal generates the planet's magnetic field. Without a magnetic field, Earth would have no protection from the the solar wind, and life as we know it wouldn't exist. [Photo Timeline: How the Earth Formed]

One alternate way to explain the magnetic field, that doesn't require heat-driven convection, holds that the convection is driven by changes in composition inside of the Earth. The inner core started forming about 1 billion years ago, when temperatures finally dropped low enough for iron metal to freeze solid, scientists think. As iron continues to solidify, lighter elements in the metal mixture, such as oxygen and carbon, may escape and rise toward the mantle, fueling convection currents.

It's also possible that a heat-driven magnetic field, or geodynamo, existed before the inner core formed, said Monica Pozzo, a geophysicist at University College London and leader of the 2012 modeling work.

"A sure impact of this [new] work will be to intensify the current debate on the thermal history of the Earth and the workings of the geodynamo," Pozzo said.

Follow Becky Oskin @beckyoskin. Follow Live Science @livescience, Facebook & Google+. Originally published on Live Science .


Unsolved: Russian scientists reveal Earth's magnetism is more mysterious than ever

© Flickr/ Scott Kelly / NASA

An international team of scientists led by Russian Professor Igor Abrikosov have disproved a popular theory about the formation of the Earth's magnetic field.

A group of scientists from Linköping University (Sweden), Jožef Stefan Institute (Slovenia), Russia's National University of Science and Technology MISiS and France's École Polytechnique have helped to disprove a widely-held theory about the Earth's magnetic field, RIA Novosti reported on Tuesday.

Along with the Earth's atmosphere, the magnetic field provides a defense for the Earth from the charged particles in cosmic rays. By deflecting the particles away from Earth, many are preventing from even hitting the atmosphere directly, ensuring that the planet's life-forms are protected.

In January 2015 scientists from the Carnegie Institution for Science and Rutgers University (US) published a paper in the journalNature which appeared to complete a traditional theory about the source of our planet's magnetic field.

According to the traditional theory, the Earth's solid inner core spins and powers thermal convection of molten iron alloy in the Earth's outer core. This generates electric currents, which in turn produce magnetic fields. 

© Sputnik/ Alexander Liskin
A model of the earth's internal structure at the Moscow Planetarium.

However, in 2012 geophysicists in the UK published a supercomputer model which demonstrated that iron in the planet's core is more efficient at conducting heat than previously thought.
"Put simply, the paradox is that in this model, so much heat escaped from the core via conduction that there wasn't enough energy left over to fuel convection (when heat creates motion) in the liquid outer core. The implication: Earth's magnetic field shouldn't exist," LiveScience explained.
The 2015 paper appeared to overcome this conundrum, because it apparently proved the traditional model.

"There was a big problem in how you generate a magnetic field, and now, because of our results, that problem has basically gone away," study co-author Ron Cohen told LiveScience.

However, Cohen and co-authors Peng Zhang and K. Haule have now printed a retraction of their paper, based on experiments by an international team of scientists led by Professor in Theoretical Physics Igor Abrikosov.
"L. Pourovskii, J. Mravlje, S. Simak and I. Abrikosov could not reproduce our findings, which led us to re-examine our computations. We found an error of a factor of two that is due to our neglect of spin degeneracy (two electrons per band), which would halve the electron - electron resistivity," and increase the flow of electric current, they explained in their retraction.
As a result, the presence of the Earth's magnetic field remains as much a mystery as ever, representatives from Russia's National University of Science and Technology told RIA Novosti on Tuesday.

"The researchers from the US agreed with Abrikosov's group, and in April 2016 they retracted their article from the Naturejournal. The classical theory has been disproved again," MISiS explained.
"Now scientists have to return to the calculations made in 2012, which show that heat convection generates the Earth's magnetic field. The thermal history of the planet remains an open discussion.


Sign-up for RSS Updates:  Subscribe in a reader

[Subscribe to Stillness in the Storm Blog by Email]
View and Share our Images
Curious about Stillness in the Storm? 
See our About this blog - Contact Us page.

If it was not for the gallant support of readers, we could not devote so much energy into continuing this blog. We greatly appreciate any support you provide!

We hope you benefit from this not-for-profit site 

It takes hours of work every day to maintain, write, edit, research, illustrate and publish this blog. We have been greatly empowered by our search for the truth, and the work of other researchers. We hope our efforts 
to give back, with this website, helps others in gaining 
knowledge, liberation and empowerment.

"There are only two mistakes one can make along the road to truth; 
not going all the way, and not starting." - Buddha

If you find our work of value, consider making a Contribution.
This website is supported by readers like you. 

[Click on Image below to Contribute]

No comments :

Post a Comment

SITS blog is a venue where Data we come across can be shared with all of you. If we look past personal bias, and distill the Absolute Data within each post, our natural intuition will assemble these nuggets together and reveal a greater truth.

We do not know what that truth is yet of course. We are discovering that together as a whole by sharing and discussing our unique perspective. Share your thoughts and we will all come to a greater understanding as one.

Support Stillness in the Storm