Sunday, October 11, 2015

Cosmic Lottery | Earth and Moon Are in a Reciprocal Mathematic Relationship

Scott, from Secrets In Plain Sight has produced another fascinating analysis of numerical measurements and observations. 

Scott produces a scientific analysis of synchronicity in numbers measured almost everywhere observations are done; found throughout the planet, solar system and beyond. The likelihood that these measurement systems were at random only to have them match universal constants discovered later is all but impossible. Cleary the progenitors of modern day and ancient measurement systems understood the essential mathematical nature of the universe. 

The below linked article is a three and a half hour documentary revealing the connections between sacred sights, modern cities  and geological measurements; a showcase of Scott's work. I strongly suggest watching this seminal film, if you are in interested Ley Lines, electromagnetic field connections, wisdom of the ancients, and much more. 

Related UNDENIABLE TRUTH - Secrets in Plain Sight - Great for Beginners

In below article, Earth and Moon connections are explored revealing a reciprocal relationship to within six orders of magnitude. There is no other planet and moon relationship like this else where in the solar system. This is just a small sample of all the peculiar relationships Scott has discovered in his work.



The relationship suggest that the Moon may not be a naturally occurring object and could in fact be artificial in nature, towed into place by some highly advanced ancient race of the past. 

Related Could The Moon Be An Ancient Space Ark? | Strange Moon Facts


- Justin

Source - Secrets In Plain Sight

Physicist Max Tegmark has identified 32 dimensionless ratios that are basic properties of reality in his though-provoking book, Our Mathematical Universe: My Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality. These are 32 pure numbers from which every other fundamental constant of nature can be theoretically derived.
In this illustration I depicted these parameters and added the missing on/off switch, bringing the grand total of controls needed to mathematically define a universe up to the magic 33.
33 controls must be tuned to create our universe
33 controls must be tuned to create our universe
These knobs must be so incredibly finely-tuned to create a universe, let alone a universe capable of supporting life, that we have truly won the cosmic lottery. Tegmark explains:
“How far could you rotate the dark-energy knob before the “Oops!” moment? The current setting of the knob, corresponding to the dark-energy density we’ve actually measured, is about 10−27 kilograms per cubic meter, which is almost ridiculously close to zero compared to the available range: the natural maximum value for the dial is a dark-energy density around 1097kilograms per cubic meter, which is when the quantum fluctuations fill space with tiny black holes, and the minimum value is the same with a minus sign in front. If rotating the dark-energy knob…by a full turn would vary the density across the full range, then the actual knob setting for our Universe is about 10−123 of a turn away from the halfway point. That means that if you want to tune the knob to allow galaxies to form, you have to get the angle by which you rotate it right to over 120 decimal places!
…if the electromagnetic force were weakened by a mere 4%, then the Sun would immediately explode as its hydrogen fused into so-called diprotons, an otherwise nonexistent kind of neutron-free helium. If it were significantly strengthened, previously stable atoms such as carbon and oxygen would radioactively decay away.
If the so-called weak nuclear force were substantially weaker, there would be no hydrogen around, since it would all have been converted to helium shortly after our Big Bang. If it were either much stronger or much weaker, the neutrinos from a supernova explosion would fail to blow away the outer parts of the star, and it’s doubtful whether life-supporting heavier elements such as iron would ever be able to leave the stars where they were produced and end up in planets such as Earth.
If electrons were much lighter, there could be no stable stars, and if they were much heavier, there could be no ordered structures such as crystals and DNA molecules. If protons were 0.2% heavier, they’d decay into neutrons unable to hold on to electrons, so there would be no atoms. If they were instead much lighter, then neutrons inside of atoms would decay into protons, so there would be no stable atoms except for hydrogen. Indeed, the proton mass depends on another knob that has a very wide range of variation and needs to be fine-tuned to thirty-three decimal places to get any stable atoms other than hydrogen.
Many of these fine-tuning examples were discovered in the seventies and eighties by Paul Davies, Brandon Carter, Bernard Carr, Martin Rees, John Barrow, Frank Tipler, Steven Weinberg and other physicists. And more examples just kept turning up.”
The Moon and the Sun constitute further proof we passengers on spaceship Earth are winners. There is nothing in physics that says the Moon and Sun must appear the same size in our skies. In fact our Moon is the only satellite in our system that even comes close to doing this. It is truly amazing that the Moon and Sun discs match up—and they won’t forever as the Moon is slowly moving away from the Earth. We won the cosmic lottery again!
A look at any total solar eclipse is proof of the astronomically unlikely situation that the Sun is 400 times larger than the Moon and 400 times father away from Earth than the Moon.
Luc Viatour / www.Lucnix.be CC-BY-SA-3.0
Luc Viatour / www.Lucnix.be CC-BY-SA-3.0
I discovered another such symmetry in the orbital dynamics of Moon and Earth.
During one orbit around the Sun, Earth actually rotates about its own axis 366.3 times. The Moon orbits the Earth in 27.3 days. Of course a day is one Earth rotation on its own axis.
366.3 x 27.3 = 9999.99
At the same time, the Earth is 366.3% the diameter of the Moon and the Moon is 27.3% the diameter of Earth.
366.3% x 27.3% = .999999
Rotations
Rotations
To better understand why the Earth rotates more times than there are days in the year, watch this clear explanation:
How can it be that the Earth and Moon are in a reciprocal mathematical relationship in terms of number of rotations and in the pure ratios of diameters? Nothing in physics says this need be so. It is far too perfect and we won the cosmic lottery yet again!
CONTINUE READING @ secretsinplainsight.com
_________

Source:


________________________________________________________________

Sign-up for RSS Updates:  Subscribe in a reader

Sign-up for Email Updates:


Delivered by FeedBurner

View and Share our Images
Curious about Stillness in the Storm? 
See our About this blog - Contact Us page.

If it was not for the galant support of readers, we could not devote so much energy into continuing this blog. We greatly appreciate any support you provide!

We hope you benefit from this not-for-profit site 

It takes hours of work every day to maintain, write, edit, research, illustrate and publish this blog. We have been greatly empowered by our search for the truth, and the work of other researchers. We hope our efforts 
to give back, with this website, helps others in gaining 
knowledge, liberation and empowerment.

"There are only two mistakes one can make along the road to truth; 
not going all the way, and not starting." - Buddha

If you find our work of value, consider making a Contribution.
This website is supported by readers like you. 

[Click on Image below to Contribute]

Support Stillness in the Storm

Sign up for Gaia TV

Sign up for Gaia TV
By signing up through this link you also support SITS