Tuesday, February 17, 2015

Learn to Discern | Alfred Lambremont Webre responds to Ken from Redefining God - "Elephants are grey, but not all grey things are elephants"

Julian and I have been posting data from any and all sources since the beginning of this blog in 2013. Our intent, as always, is not to hold a flag of truth, but to offer data and a perspective which can activate the inner process of critical thinking and truth discernment within each of us.
We began sharing Ken's articles from Redefining God, as some of the conceptual point's and data he offers helps clarify potentially hazy claims. He is one of many other presenters we share, including David Wilcock, Benjamin Fulford, Mark Passio and Alfred Webre; to name a few. Sometimes just seeing a name, evokes a response of excitement, and this reflects how credible we think a person is. David Wilcock is a very popular figure, and I love reviewing his data, but I hardly consider him a know it all, and while the hard science he offers is very intriguing, his predictions and perspectives can sometimes be dubious; a claim I can make for anyone. So what makes something true is not who is saying it but the veracity of the idea behind the presenters and their words. 

Credibility is the term which refers to a person's trustworthiness, and it can help us by activating our higher discernment processes, but we should always attempt to analyze the idea first before throwing any babies out with bathwater. The classical definition of a skeptic is one who does not blindly believe an idea, but does not dismiss it either, investigating it as much as possible. 

The Credibility Discernment Trap is a term referring to the tendency to focus on who is sharing an idea as the sole measure of accuracy, due to lack of knowledge about the idea being offered. As a result, many choose to believe (or not) what is presented based solely on the person discussing it and their reputation, instead of the ideas themselves. We need only look out into society to see the vast majority of unawakened people operate in this way, accepting ideas only if they are peer reviewed or if they came from XYZ source.

Due to pervasive conditioning, many people simply do not have time or the faculties to discern what is real for themselves, and rely on experts. The trap being, we could become the acolytes of the expert following them like a religious figure, instead of using them as a source for data we contemplate. Of course every piece of knowledge we gain comes from someone (including ourselves) who spent time and energy to understand it, so in this sense experts and scholars can be very helpful. But if we do not learn the specific details personally, we could fall into a dualistic mindset: "this person is true, and this other person is false." However if we examine even the most obvious example of a 'shill' or 'dis-info' agent, there are many concepts offered which have truth in them. Fox News is widely regarded as a propaganda network by most aware people, yet when it was reported "the World Trade Center collapsed," it does not mean this is untrue. Rarely, if ever, can we so easily cast someone into the category of absolute liar or shill; for a web of lies is woven with strands of truth, but the ideas can certainly be judged on their merits.

How can we separate the wheat from the chaff? Julian and I can hardly claim to be perfect truth discerners, but one guiding principle has helped us greatly in understanding where all the data points fit together. 

Shoot the Idea, Not the Messenger 

Instead of trying to focus on who the person is, we focus on what they are saying; we judge the data on the conceptual merits alone. For example, if a well reputed liar says "the earth is round", focusing on credibility alone would preclude us to think the earth must not be round, because 'a liar said it was.' Instead, if we just ask ourselves the question... "well is the earth really round, is there any evidence and data to support this premise?" then we can easily come to a conclusion about the notion offered. Often the question of evidence brings to light the sheer lack of it in most of the widely accepted ideas on earth; faith in: Vaccination, Government, Materialist Science, Darwinism, etc. - all widely accepted with only circumstantial data to support it at best. 

The idea that helps us in discernment is knowing the difference between Circumstantial Evidence (taking several points of data and making an inference) opposed to Direct Evidence (citing a discrete event with hard observational data suggestive of a causal relationship). For example, 9/11 was a real event, and we have a great deal of observational data to support this, but theory of 19 hijackers (the official story) is based largely on circumstantial evidence; ticket purchases, phone calls, etc. The difference is between the objective reality, what actually IS, and our subjective experience, what we think is happening. Rarely is the difference spoken of explicitly, and many debunkings and opinions offered by science and internet guru's alike is nothing more than glorified opinion based on circumstantial evidence. 

With this process of discernment hopefully firmly in mind, we want to discuss the recent scuffle between Ken and Alfred Lambremont Webre.

With respect to Alfred Webre, Ken cites that Webre worked at Stanford Research Institute, which is known for being a major center for NWO training, so to speak, as there have been many widely recognized NWO proponents coming from Stanford. Additionally, he interprets Webre's opinion about BRICS being the 'golden age magic bullet' by suggesting "no one needs to do anything but just wait.' as if this is the main idea behind Webre's workWhile I do agree there are many people who unconsciously accept the idea that nothing needs to be done, this is hardly proof that Webre is a paid shill. 

On the other hand, Webre offers some very interesting ideas about timelines, but rarely gives any hard data supporting their validity. His claim to proof stems from him being a whistleblower. And while I have researched a great deal of hard scientific evidence to support the notion of timelines, the point is, his premise is unsupported by hard evidence, it is an inference. 

Taking all this into consideration, the following post by Ken about Webre and the response from Webre reads like a mud slinging match. Other than Ken's point about us being more proactive in our own lives to bring about change, there is no more direct evidence to suggest Webre is a NWO shill than Ken is. 

In the present age of prolific deception, the temptation to focus on who is sharing an idea, instead of what the idea is talking about is very great. In engaging with our fellows in conversation, facebook etc. we observe many people dismissing concepts because of the source instead of the conceptual basis of the premise being shared.

This Credibility Discernment Trap of dualistic thinking, we just discussed, can be summed up into one short statement:
"Elephants are grey, but not all grey things are elephants"
The following is a great exercise in discernment. Try and see the concept each person is offering, and then ask: "what evidence is there to support this idea?" Then once you have found the evidence, try to focus just on it alone, divorced from the source, and make a probability assessment on it. If an idea can stand on its own, especially because you have taken the time to understand how it works, not only does it have a high probability of being true, but you have grown immeasurably from the experience. In the future you may not judge the man, but instead, judge the idea because now you have the eyes to see the difference between the two.

- Justin

Source - Redefining God

The NWO and the New Age Mind-Screw: Part 1 – Alfred Lambremont Webre (Updates 1-3 – When in trouble, trot out the straw man)

Don’t be ashamed if you’ve ever fallen for some form of New Age BS…
…It is a highly-polished, massively-promoted, multi-billion dollar product that was scientifically formulated over decades by the brightest sellouts the globalists could buy. The only shame is in not listening to inner and outer warnings to move past it.
While the globalists’ political and financial people have been busy erecting the superstructure of the multilateral/multipolar New World Order, their psychologists and sociologists have been busy as well. Through institutions like the Tavistock Institute in the UK and the Stanford Research Institute in the US, globalist minions have been formulating ways of molding the thinking of the masses to make them NWO-compatible.

Information about Tavistock and Stanford Research (now called SRI International) is all over the internet, but I found a particularly concise and informative introduction to them on page 326 of David Livingstone’s Black Terror White Soldiers: Islam, Fascism & the New Age
SRI is based in Menlo Park, California, and you can find hints of their involvement in the development of the 1960’s drug counterculture and CIA mind control techniques in the Wikipedia entry for MKUltra
“Merry Prankster Ken Kesey, author of One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, volunteered for MKUltra experiments involving LSD and other psychedelic drugs at the Veterans Administration Hospital in Menlo Park while he was a student at nearby Stanford University. Kesey’s experiences while under the influence of LSD inspired him to promote the drug outside the context of the MKUltra experiments, which influenced the early development of hippie culture.
Robert Hunter is an American lyricist, singer-songwriter, translator, and poet, best known for his association with Jerry Garcia and the Grateful Dead. Along with Ken Kesey, Hunter was an early volunteer MKUltra test subject at Stanford University. Stanford test subjects were paid to take LSD, psilocybin, and mescaline, then report on their experiences. These experiences were creatively formative for Hunter…”
As it turns out, an alumnus of SRI has been very active in the alternative media, and he has been applying New Age mind control themes to the newly awakening in order to facilitate their acceptance of the nascent BRICS-fronted NWO. His name is Alfred Lambremont Webre
“In 1977, he joined SRI International in Menlo Park, California, as a futurist for the Center for the Study of Social Policy. His responsibilities were the studies in alternative futures, innovation diffusion, and social policy applications for clients including the Carter White House Extraterrestrial Communications Study, the National Science Foundation, U.S. Congress (Office of Technology Assessment), the U.S. Department of Energy, and the State of California (Energy Plan).”

So Webre was responsible for dreaming up “alternative futures,” and he has used that experience to good effect in the “alternate timelines” mind-screw he is currently foisting upon the awakening public. Let’s have a look at the sh*t he’s been shoveling by examining a recent interview of him
…Here is an overview offered by an associated news page
“VANCOUVER, BC – In an interview with JF Simard of Informedplanetradio.com, NewsInsideOut.com’s Alfred Lambremont Webre discusses how a positive holographic timeline that activated around December 21, 2012 will transforms a planned 2015 financial collapse of the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank fiat Petrodollar into a new planetary age of individual Sovereignty and a BRICS Golden Age.
This planned and unsuccessful 2015 (or so) $dollar collapse is actually one of the functional components of the Jesuit-Matrix depopulation plan that includes Fukushima radiation, GMOs, Vaccines, GeoEngineering, Wars, planned financial collapse and the Transhumanist Agenda, all orchestrated along a catastrophic timeline that is no longer operative in our time-space hologram.”
In the interview, Webre claims that the evil Anglo-American “elite” (in association with Draco Reptilian aliens who have a penchant for ‘human sushi’) had plans to depopulate the Earth through a Mad Max-style economic collapse (in conjunction with “Fukushima radiation, GMOs, Vaccines, and GeoEngineering”), but this “catastrophic timeline” was altered by the timeline fairies on December 21, 2012. He asserts that humanity is now on a “positive timeline” that will feature a “BRICS Golden Age.” So according to him, the evil Anglosphere is trying to kill everybody, therefore “the whole world is migrating over to the BRICS system” (41:03).
This narrative of his precisely follows the Decoy-NWO vs. Real-NWO problem / reaction / solution format I’ve identified in many previous entries (here is one). The following excerpts speak about the globalist strategy:
“They have widely publicized a heinous New World Order planned by the Western Powers while simultaneously publicizing a benign New World Order planned by China and its allies (thus establishing danger from one side and safety from another)…
Problem – The evil Western power elite are out to steal everything and kill everybody!!!
Reaction – People are both angry and fearful, and are longing to end the old system and start something new.
Solution – The angelic BRICS power elite swoop in on white unicorns to save the day and give us a new financial system and all the money people need.
Now let’s have a look at some specific quotes from the interview…
From the 30:09 mark: “What occurred is that on December 21, 2012, a number of things happened. One is that the holographic timeline on which our collective travels shifted from a catastrophic timeline to a positive timeline, such that plans and projects that were conceived on the catastrophic timeline, in what we call duality consciousness of ‘I win, you lose,’ no longer have the traction now in the positive timeline of unity consciousness, which is ‘we are one.’ Somebody changed the video game. We’re no longer in ‘war, disease, crime and poverty'; we’re now in ‘paradise on earth‘…”
If you consider the implication of this timeline idea, it is the same as the “Ascension” and “Alien Saviors” memes: “Don’t bother doing anything about the NWO, because we’re on a positive timeline that will sweep you where you want to go. Just relax, don’t feed the evil with your attention, and concentrate on ‘raising your vibration.'” The whole idea of “the ‘light’ has already won” only serves to de-motivate awakening people from taking action that could actually make a difference (such as forming their own political and monetary structures). As for the “paradise on earth” part of the passage, I talked about this in The Multilateral/Multipolar New World Order will seem like heaven… at first.
From the 32:15 mark: “Now, getting around to this… what this means is that the controllers, the matrix, as part of their depopulation plan had included a financial collapse component as sort of the centerpiece, or one of the centerpieces, of their depopulation plan that would click in, say, around 2015. And if they could combine that with World War 3, if they could combine that with famine, if they could combine that with ebola, if they could combine that with GMOs, hey, you know, it’s mass extinction. It’s exterminate all those surface-dwellers…
(34:16) So it remains to be seen that the financial system is going to collapse in the usual, the expected way in February of [2015]. Why? Because none of their false flags has worked in the way that we think.
It is true that the evil depopulation plan and its associated false flags will fail, but it has nothing to do with a new “positive timeline.” I laid out the reasons the globalists are sabotaging their own false flags in Throwing the Game: Why the globalists are exposing their own false-flags. In fact, Webre suffers from a Freudian Slip when he says “none of their false flags has worked in the way that we think.” A normal person would not expect the globalists to sabotage their own attacks, so they certainly haven’t worked in the way that we think, but they have served the purpose for which they were designed. As for the whole “total economic collapse / depopulation” narrative, it is a scary campfire story the propagandists are spreading so that people will rush into the arms of the BRICS “saviors” when they step up to stop it.
From the 37:45 mark, speaking of the financial transition: “Right now, in kind of a 3D perspective, there are a lot of forces that are jockeying, but right now what it appears to be is that it’s not going to be a sudden collapse; it’s going to be a gradual transition. And what’s occurring is that the Rothschild dollar sector is collapsing because of its own lawlessness, which it itself has induced. Whereas the BRICS sector is based on honored contracts, respect for individual and national sovereignty, and they’re coming together by the two major gold producers in the world around a gold-centered currency…”
In an interview full of ridiculous statements, this passage qualifies as one of the worst. The transition to the new financial system will indeed be gradual, because it has been going on since the IMF created the dollar’s reserve currency replacement, the SDR, back in 1969. And the “Rothschild dollar sector” isn’t collapsing because of lawlessness; it’s coming down because the Rothschilds want the SDR to take the dollar’s place. I pointed this out when I covered a 1988 article from the Economist (an economic propaganda magazine partly owned by the Rothschilds) which openly speaks of replacing national currencies with a renamed SDR sometime around 2018
…(according to the globalists’ plan, once the BRICS are seen to “take over” the IMF, both the IMF and SDR will get fresh new names to make a clean break from the past).
As for the BRICS sector being based on respect for individual sovereignty, are you kidding me? Just ask the regular Joes in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa how their governments treat them. “Like dirt” would be the most prevalent answer.
From the 45:09 mark: “Thankfully, in December 21, 2012 we shifted timelines … we’re back here now… we’re on the positive timeline, and the destiny of the American people is to go back to their original constitutional roots to operate… to become once again their own bankers, and to operate their own currency as all of the other nations do within the basket of currencies that will exist, as a nation inside a worldwide gold system.”
When you think about killing off the Federal Reserve and going back to the Constitution and some form of gold standard, what political figure comes to mind? Ron Paul, right? This is why I’ve been warning that he’s a sellout. And when Webre mentions a “worldwide gold system” and “the basket of currencies that will exist,” he’s talking about the IMF’s SDR, which is a basket of currencies that will soon include a gold component in its valuation.
Finally, at the 53:22 mark, he can’t resist mentioning “Ascension”: “We are ascending up densities of consciousness.”
This is actually sort of true, because if you listen to Webre and his ilk, your mind will become progressively more dense.
Beyond Alfred Lambremont Webre’s involvement with SRI International, which is part of theRockefeller-funded Tavistock complex, the rest of his resume further betrays his status as a globalist minion…
1) He attended Yale University (one of the “elite’s” Ivy League indoctrination academies), and he was a Fulbright Scholar (one of the scholarship programs used by the globalists to recruit the brightest and most ambitious minds into their system). This scholarship was used to studyinternational economic integration in Uruguay. Needless to say, international economic integration is core to the globalist agenda.
2) He has worked with globalist-run governments, foundations and NGOs, including the Ford Foundation.
3) He’s been involved with the Rockefeller-founded/funded United Nations. As his bio states…
“Between 1982–1987, he was a Non Governmental Organization (NGO) Delegate at the United Nations in New York. He was involved with the Communications Coordination Committee for the United Nations, with the UNISPACE Outer Space Conference (Vienna) and involved with the United Nations Second Special Session on Disarmament.”
4) And he’s been involved in the Rockefeller-founded/funded UFO Disclosure Movement. According to his bio…
“He helped draft the Citizen Hearing in 2000 with Stephen Bassett and serves as a member of the Board of Advisors. Webre is also the congressional coordinator for The Disclosure Project [founded by Steven Greer].”
Information on the Disclosure Movement’s connection with Laurance Rockefeller, who was one of the Special Studies Project architects of the New World Order, can be found in myExtraterrestrials category.
So there you have it: Alfred Lambremont Webre has the resume of a globalist minion, is baffling the awakening community with New Agey BS, and is promoting the Rockefeller-designed BRICS New World Order as a gift from the timeline fairies. What more do you need to see in order to recognize him for what he is?
Webre is just one of a truly overwhelming number of BS artists who are assisting with the NWO rollout, so I’ve got my work cut out for me. The next stop for this train will be “Cobra” and Rob Potter.
[Update 1 – 6 February 2015]
Subtle techniques of mind control
This morning, I received an email from someone trying to do damage control on Alfred Webre’s behalf. Since the points brought up in the email have interesting counterpoints, I thought I might share them with you. For privacy purposes, I’ll paraphrase what the writer said…
> “Alfred’s theories on time travel are based on evidence provided by whistleblowers like Cramer and Basiago.”
I’ve noticed that there are lots of “whistleblowers” running around on the interview and conference circuits. Many of them claim to be offering “beyond top secret” information and openly brag that they’re violating secrecy oaths and contracts to tell us their stories, yet they never go to jail and have no problem boarding planes to attend the various paid conferences (so they’re not even on the No-Fly List). Don’t you find that interesting?
If you want to build a false paradigm in people’s minds, here’s how you do it:
1) You have paid disinformation agents pose as whistleblowers and tell the public tall tales.
2) You have other disinformation agents promote the whistleblowers with interviews and conferences.
3) You have yet other disinformation agents put together all of the “whisleblower testimonies” into books and videos that outline and support the false paradigm.
Do you think any of these three steps is beyond the capacity of the globalist intelligence services? Alfred’s job at SRI was to dream up crap like alternate timelines for Chrissake.
> “Alfred has said many times that he’s suspicious of the BRICS.”
Of that I have no doubt. Have you ever noticed how the information of some alternative media sources is “all over the place”? They offer information that is contradictory and seems to point in every direction, and this creates great confusion in the minds of their followers. In my experience, there are two kinds of people who do this: people who are very confused in their own thinking, and people who are running mind control on their followers. Let me tell you about the latter type…
If you wanted to move people in a certain direction, how would you do it? There are actually many ways, but this is one:
1) You point them in every direction so they become confused and can’t tell which way is north anymore.
2) As you do so, you point them in the direction you want them to go more often than you point them in the other directions.
3) The net result is that people move in the direction you want in a zombie-like state. They are so overwhelmed by conflicting messages that they stop trying to think for themselves and just go with the flow (right into the NWO).
> “Alfred has pointed to one of your articles before on his Facebook page.”
I’ve observed a number of known disinformation sources pointing to my articles before (usually because their followers doggedly pursued them about it), and they typically do one of two things:
1) They feign interest or agreement, but then offer their own subtle commentary to try to tie in what I’m saying to what they’ve been saying, thus moving their followers back onto the narrative they’re selling. Some trolls on the comment boards also use this technique; I call them “sidle-up shills.”
2) They feign interest or agreement, but then go right back to selling their narrative as though nothing had happened.
All this being said, this entry on Albert is not the product of my coming across one bad interview of his. I’ve observed him actively promoting lots of bad information over time, and when I came across the title of this particular interview, it was the straw that broke the camel’s back.
Another reason I chose to bust him with this interview is because it is an interview of him (not an interview in which he is questioning someone else), so it reflects his “personal views” / core talking points. And when you tie his talking points to his background, there can be no confusion about who he is and what he’s doing.
When you finally reach the end of your earthly journey, I want you to remember one thing: Ken loved you so much that he forced himself to listen to an Alfred Lambremont Webre interview for a whole hour. If that’s not commitment to the Truth and to your well being, I don’t know what is. So when you commune with Source and hand out your blessings, remember that I’d like a thousand-year vacation at an exotic island resort, complete with umbrella drinks and a nice woman. ;-)

[Update 2 – 6 February 2015]
It’s hard to kick the Kool Aid habit
I visited Jean Haines’ blog this morning to see if she had posted or acknowledged this article. It was due to so often seeing Webre’s information on her site that I chose to do this entry, and I had her and her readers in mind as I wrote it. As it turns out, she did post it, but with this preface…
To address Alfred’s comment, there are a significant number of “whistleblowers” who have “come out” of bankster agencies like the CIA, the FBI, the Pentagon, the World Bank, SRI, etc. to supposedly tell the truth. Noting this, one has to ask, “Did they really make a break with their employers, or did their employers simply assign them the job of playing the whisleblower?” This is where the concept of the “limited hangout” comes into play…
“A limited hangout, or partial hangout, is a public relations or propaganda technique that involves the release of previously hidden information in order to prevent a greater exposure of more important details.”
So as “whistleblowers” like Webre come forward and reveal previously hidden information about Cabal operations, they are drawing people’s attention away from the big secret: that the Cabal is behind the BRICS Alliance and is using it to implement the multilateral / multipolar NWO they’ve been planning since World War 2. In fact, not only are the whistleblowers’ efforts drawing our attention away from the Cabal/BRICS connection, they are actually serving to build up the West as villains and the BRICS as heroes.
Remember that the BRICS-fronted New World Order will be presented as a happy solution to all the problems that are being deliberately created by the Western institutions. And when the BRICS heroes get their cue to step up and “save the day,” the evil Western institutions will be either shut down or overhauled and renamed. Phony whistleblower information facilitates this switchover. Since it’s “out with the Old (World Order)” and “in with the New (World Order),” the whistleblowers are bashing the old and promoting the new.
As for Jean standing with Alfred, she did the same thing when I busted Neil Keenan back in July of 2013. Here is the final paragraph from the first entry I wrote on him, Neil Keenan Reveals his Illuminati Ties
“So if you are among those who have not yet seen the Keenan information for what it really is, how much more is it going to take? I realize how difficult it is to admit to being scammed and to give up on something you really, really want to be true. But if you cannot admit to yourself when you’re wrong, you cannot grow. And we need every conscious being we can muster if we are going to bypass the trap the Illuminati have prepared for us.” [Since I encountered the Keenan video I wrote about on Jean’s site, I wrote this paragraph with her in mind.]
I went on to write more articles debunking him and his narrative, and I sent Jean the links in a comment I wrote on her site, but I was rebuffed. She sided with Neil just like she is siding with Alfred now. How long must history repeat itself before we learn from it?
[Update 3 – 6 February 2015]
When in trouble, trot out the straw man
I just saw this little tidbit from Webre on Jean Haines’ site…
The only problem with his argument is that he’s refuting a claim I never made. If you read what I wrote, I first introduced the reader to Tavistock and SRI (including evidence of SRI’s involvement with MKUltra), then I introduced Webre’s involvement with SRI as a futurist (with a passage straight out of his Wikipedia bio). I never made the argument that he was a “futurist with MKUltra.” This little trick he’s pulling is called a straw man argument.
He then tries to distract people with details about the Carter White House Extraterrestrial Communication Study. I guess he’s saying he’s a whistleblower because he promoted the existence of UFOs and ETs back then. But if that makes you a whistleblower, then Laurance Rockefeller, the Jesuits, and the Vatican were/are whistleblowers too. They have been deeply involved in the promotion of UFOs/ETs…
As for the “misleading projection” allegation, he is doing that with his own comment. Physician, heal thyself.
Love always…

Source - Exopolitics Blog

KEN BUSTED IN 3 STEPS! "KEN" NOBODY authors historically inaccurate poison pen piece to discredit Alfred Lambremont Webre, only to have KEN's inaccurate article expose KEN as a fabricator and fraud

STEP 1: "Ken" [No last name, still hiding behind the cowardice of anonymity] writes wildly projective and factually inaccurate rant attempting to discredit Alfred Lambremont Webre's brilliant analysis in  VIDEO: Alfred Webre: Positive timeline transforms planned 2015 U$dollar collapse into Sovereignty, BRICS Golden Age

KEN's fabricated rant can be found at
The NWO and the New Age Mind-Screw: Part 1 – Alfred Lambremont Webre | RedefiningGod.com
This is a Hit Piece on the Positive Timeline that buries Alfred's role as whistleblower exposing SRI, Tavistock, Skull & Bones, and deliberately distorts the Positive Future = Positive Timeline + Unity Consciousness analysis of the future of the world financial system and reverses the Positive Future equation with the discredited Illuminati equation, despite Alfred having clearly written:

Creating a Positive Future: Time Science Shows Our Earth is on a Positive Timeline in our Time Space Hologram

By Alfred Lambremont Webre*
  • “It’s time science, not rocket science that Earth is on a positive timeline.”
  • Positive Future = Positive Timeline + Unity Consciousness
Positive Future = Positive Timeline + Unity Consciousness
A key discovery promulgated in this paper is that (1) a critical mass of humanity is (2) co-creating a positive future, through conscious acknowledgement that (3) we are synergistically traveling along a positive timeline (4) in Unity consciousness.
The Positive Future equation has supplanted and overcome an outdated Matrix Elite formula that is no longer effective:
Problem + Reaction = Solution
Positive Future equation
The Positive Future equation is:
Positive Future = Positive Timeline + Unity Consciousness
The Positive Future equation suggests that in the synergy between the Positive Timeline and Unity consciousness, a critical mass of humanity is collectively and individually activated for some or more of these suggested actions and policies for a positive future, and synchronistically resources and actors are brought together in multi-dimensional universe processes to manifest a desirable result.
STEP TWO: KEN premises his hit piece article around an historically false version of what Alfred did at SRI, by stating that Alfred did MKULTRA and by omitting that Alfred's principal project there was initiating the 1977 Carter White House Extraterrestrial Communication Study.  
ALFRED NOTES: I was a Futurist 1977-78 at SRI not MKULTRA. I was director of the 1977 proposed Carter White House Extraterrestrial Communication Study until the Pentagon shut the study down in Oct 1977 by stating that (1) THERE WERE NO UFOS OR ETs (2) if it went forward they would cancel all of its contracts with SRI, which were 25% of its budget. Consequently I left SRI in early 1978. I was a whistleblower before, during, and after my stay at SRI.

Maybe the problem with all the condemnation is that the condemners CAN'T IMAGINE A PERSON WITH INNER MORAL PRINCIPLES.  That is what I think!


"Proposed 1977 Carter Extraterrestrial Communication Study"

Preliminary Study Proposals
It is not a well know fact that the Carter administration actually proposed and hosted a number UFO studies. When Carter first entered the White House it was known from his public declaration of having been a UFO witness, that he was familiar with what the objects were. Further, his campaign promise to release everything held by the U.S. government on the subject, placed the new President into a position where studies would be required to get at the facts.
One study that was proposed and which almost got of the ground was one proposed by the Stanford Research Institute. It has been called the "Carter Extraterrestrial Communication Study."
In May 1977, only months after the inauguration of Jimmy Carter, the preliminaries of a project to study extraterrestrial communications was set up at the Center for the Study of Social Policy at the Stanford Research Institute.
The study was headed by Dr. Alfred Webre, a Yale trained lawyer and Senior Policy Analyst at the Center. Peter Schwartz, another senior Policy Analyst, was an advisor to the project. Tom Thomas, the Supervisor of the Center had approved and signed off on the proposal.
During his interview, prior to being brought on to the Stanford staff, Webre has asked "to do an extraterrestrial project." This study would be based on a theory Webre had published in the early 1970s called the Context Communication Theory of Extraterrestrials which held that extraterrestrial phenomena could be interpreted by certain laws.
While campaigning Jimmy Carter for President had made his declaration of his sighting and intention to release all the UFO data. It provided Webre the ideal opportunity for his study. "It was a godsend," stated Webre. "We took Carter on his word."
Webre immediately began to identify "people inside the Carter White House who were sympathetic to the UFO issue."
The study proposed containing no classified aspects. The initial contact within the Carter white House for the proposal was Stewart Eisenstatt, with the Domestic Policy Staff. Webre pitched the outline of the proposed study. The White House agreed, and the work began.
Webre flew from California to Washington to meet in the Executive Office Building with White House Domestic Policy Staff every two or three weeks. "The proposal was known and approved within the Domestic Policy Staff of the White House," said Webre, "and it was in circulation with the White House Science Advisors Office." The meeting continued with the Carter White House from May 1977 till September 1977.
I was signed in and out and I would meet with her around the proposals. The structure of our proposal was that the White House would remain the overall policy director on this research proposal, which was envisioned to be about three years long. Once a final report was issued under the proposal it would become a White House document, and would come out under their agency and their policy recommendations.
The study to provide knowledge on the subject, and propose a future course of action, had three phases:
Creation of a data base of UFOs and extraterrestrials in private and non-private collections. The proposal involved obtaining data worldwide as opposed to simply the United States
Evaluation phase where searches would be made for "alternate models using the best scientific minds available.
The final report and recommendations, and the creation of "a permanent, open, global data-base under independent control for UFO and EBE (extraterrestrial biological entity) encounters. The final report would have included "recommendation for the recission of intelligence and military secrecy regulations, which interfere with the flow of UFO and EBE data in the open civilian, scientific, and public domain. Hopefully it could have developed an "extraterrestrial communication project to establish non-hostile, open communication from an authoritative human source to whatever intelligence the project might find."
The extraterrestrial communications project came to the proposal stage in September 1977. The White House signed off on it, and Webre and the others involved from SRI "were given the directive to begin the personnel approaches with NASA, and with the National Science Foundation who would be the actual funding agencies for the proposal under the overall direction of the White House. James Fletcher, the NASA administrator, was provided a copy of the proposal, and began reviewing it.
Weber flew back to California to prepare for the next step at SRI. The move by the White House to green light the project, however, had set off alarm bells in the Pentagon among those whose job it was to protect the UFO secret.
When Webre arrived back at SRI, he reported that he was called back into the office of the Senior SRI Official along with Peter Schwartz. Into the room walked an African-American who was the SRI liaison at the Pentagon. He announced that the project was to be terminated. The reason for the termination of the White House approved proposal was, "There are no UFOs." He stated that he had been informed by someone in the Pentagon that "if the study went forward, SRI’s contracts with the Pentagon would be terminated."
As most of the contracts at SRI were tied into the Pentagon, the writing was on the wall for "extraterrestrial communication. Webre was told by the SRI liaison "to stimulate," and play along with it. In this way the liaison stated he would keep his job.
The Senior SRI Officer sided with the Pentagon liaison, and the extraterrestrial communication study for the Carter White House was dead.

Another person who had heard the story that the Carter administration was proposing to do a UFO study was Robert Barrow, who had been corresponding with President Ford, when he was a Congressman, on the subject of UFOs. Barrow described how the Carter people ended up talking to him about a possible study.
After Jimmy Carter assumed the Presidency, I heard the rumor along with everybody else that he might initiate a UFO study. Since I was quite into UFOs at the time, I made it known that I was interested in joining any such project in any capacity for which I might be suited. There were people in Congress who knew of my long-time interest. To my surprise, one of them recommended me to Carter's people, and the transition team indicated to that person that my name would be under consideration.
That was as far as Barrow was involved in that rumored study. He was never contacted. Another study of UFOs that was done for President Carter in the early days of the administration was known as the "L.A. Study." It was put together for the President by a number of UFO researchers in the Los Angeles area.
On May 13, 1977 four of the involved scientists Ronald R. Regan, Ph.D., William F. Hassel, PH.D., Ronald H. Olch, M.s., and Marina S. Conrad, M.A., addressed a letter to President Carter regarding their proposed UFO study.
We, the undersigned, represent an informal group of scientists, engineers and UFO investigators in the Los Angeles area who are in the process of developing a concise report on UFO phenomena based on documented UFO cases. This report will discuss UFO characteristics, physical and physiological phenomena, witness reliability and will make recommendations on several potentially fruitful areas of scientific research. When completed, this report will be delivered to the White House to provide background material to make decisions regarding the initiation of government sponsored UFO research.
The letter responding to the reseracher's letter to the President was returned by Stanley D. Schneider, assistant to the President's Science Advisor who replied with the standard line that,
All information on UFOs which the Air Force held from 1947 to 1969, when the terminated their Project Bluebook following the release of the Condon Report, has been declassified and placed in the National Archives where it is a matter of public record.
Schneider did acknowledge that a UFO study was being prepared for the President, and he did not turn it down.
We note with interest that you are preparing a report recommending such a government-supported research program. If as Jody Powell (the President's Press Secretary) suggests, you forward your completed report to this office, we shall certainly give it out consideration and make any appropriate recommendations.
The report was finished, and according to one member of the L.A. group, former NSA member Paul Smith, the report was taken to washington by Bill Moore. Copies were supposedly also give to Congressmen and Senators for their action. Bill Moore retired from researching UFOs, and the exact status of what happened to the finished report remains a mystery.
President Carter, Daniel Sheehan, and Donald Menzel : The Congressional Research Service Studies for President Carter
"Knowledge will Forever Govern Ignorance And a People Who Mean to be their Own Governors Must Arm Themselves with the Power Which Knowledge Gives" The Words of President James Madison as inscribed on the Madison Building in Washington D.C., where Daniel Sheehan claimed he was allowed to view the classified section of the USAF UFO Project Blue Book in 1977, and where he said he discovered the picture of the crashed flying saucer.
"It's always difficult to strike a balance between the public's
right to know and NASA's need for candor." Marcia Smith, a space
policy senior analyst at the Congressional Research Service in Washington, DC., as quoted by James Oberg
Shortly after President Carter came to power in January 1977, Daniel Sheehan, then General Counsel to the United States Jesuit National Headquarters - National Office of Social Ministry in Washington, D.C., was reportedly approached by Marcia S. Smith, Director of the Library of Congress’s Science and Technology Division of the Congressional Research Service.from 1984-1985.
The Congressional Research Service of the Library of Congress is a research group of more than 400 people who do research for congress and the White House. They have played more than a passing interest in the UFO problem over the years. Every one of these UFO research efforts has been led by Marcia Smith.
Sheehan reported that he was asked by Smith "to participate in a highly classified major evaluation of the UFO phenomena, and extraterrestrial intelligence." The person who made the offer was Marcia Smith. She made Sheehan a special consultant to the Congressional Research service.
Marcia had in turn learned of Sheehan from her friend Rosemary Chalk, who at the time was the Secretary to the National Science Foundation. Chalk and Sheehan attended the same church in Washington. During one conversation between the two Sheehan had told Chalk that he had wanted to be an astronaut as a young man, but that the appointments he has sought to attain this goal had been given away as political prizes to others. He told Chalk that his goal had been, "to become an astronaut and to go out into outer space, and meet other civilizations."
When Sheehan was finished telling his story about how he ended up becoming a lawyer, Chalk was surprised. She said, "Wow, I never imagined that was true, but I have someone that you have to talk to." The person who called was Marcia Smith.
A part of this contact with Marcia Smith and the CRS involved Sheehan being asked to use his position inside the Jesuit community to obtain the UFO documents held in the Vatican library. Sheehan made an approach to his contact at the Vatican.
"She called," recalled Sheehan, "and asked me if as Legal Counsel for the Jesuit Headquarters whether I could get access for the Library of Congress from the Vatican library. The Vatican library has a fairly large section concerning the issue of extraterrestrial intelligence, and UFOs. I undertook to contact the Jesuit who actually runs the Vatican library, and much to my shock, they said we couldn’t have access to it. . . I related this to Marcia Smith."
After the discussion with Marcia and Father Bill Davis, who was the Director of the National Office Sheehan made a second approach to the Vatican library.
I sent back a second letter to the Jesuit who was the head of the Vatican library, and explained to him that this was an official request that had come from the Congressional Research Service of the Library of Congress - that it had come from the Congress of the United States, and that the President himself had wanted to get this information. So I thought that would get us the information, but I received a second response from the Vatican Library saying no - the
Jesuit National Headquarters would not be provided with this information. So I had to regretfully report that back to Marcia Smith letting her know that I was not able to get it."
Sheehan recalled the encounter with Marcia where she related to him the reasons behind the study. "She ( Marcia Smith) informed me that she had been contacted by the Chairman of the Science & Technology Committee of the House of Representatives, (Congressman Olin Earl Teague) who in turn had received a directive from the President of the United States, informing the Committee that he ( Carter) in fact had personally seen a UFO while he was in Georgia."
Marcia further informed Sheehan that Carter had approached the House of Representatives Science and Technology Committee based on information he had obtained from former CIA director George Bush. Marcia Smith stated that Carter had approached Bush and stated, "I want to have the information that we have on UFOs and extraterrestrial intelligence. I want to know about this as President."
George Bush, according to Smith said, "no . . . that he wasn’t going to give this to him . . . that this was information that existed on a need to know basis only. Simple curiosity on the part of the President wasn’t adequate."
This Carter-Bush UFO question, referred to by Smith, was probably asked during the first 45 minutes of a multi hour briefing on November 19, 1976. This is the only time that Bush and Carter met while Carter was President-elect. Bush was replaced as DCI, once Carter became President, so there was never a meeting between the two after Carter entered the White House.
The 45 minute segment of the briefing given to the President-elect, was described by the CIA as a briefing on certain "exotic weapons and very closely held items relating to sources and methods."
The then Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) for President Ford, George Bush, and his assistant Jennifer Fitzgerald, took Carter and Walter Mondale to the Carter living room to provide the selected sensitive information. The other six senior agents apparently weren’t cleared for this part of the briefing. They remained waiting in the Carter study till this key part of the briefing was completed.
No matter where the Bush/Carter encounter had taken place, the fact remained that Carter was refused the requested UFO information from the CIA Director. Once Carter had been denied the requested information on UFOs, he decided to follow a suggestion that Bush had made for getting the information that Carter wanted on UFOs.
" If he was going to do this he would have to follow a different procedure," stated Sheehan, "that was going to involve all the different branches of government in authorizing this information, because they were afraid that President Carter was going to somehow publicly reveal this. Bush told him that he was going have to go to the Science and Technology Committee of the House of Representatives, in the legislative branch, and have them ask the Congressional Research Service to issue a request to have certain documents declassified so that this process could go on."
"They were," said Sheehan, "trying to stall this thing. That was going to take a long time. . .the NSA, the CIA. . .all these groups were going to hold back documents. So the President much chagrined, decided that rather than having a major confrontation with Mr. Bush, (he) would follow this process. He contacted the science and Technology Committee of the House of Representatives. They in turn contacted the Library of Congress Research Service, and they undertook two major investigations."
To determine whether extraterrestrial intelligence existed in our galaxy.
Determine what the relationship of this UFO phenomena might be to extraterrestrial intelligence.
Marcia Smith was at the time Analyst in Science and Technology, Science Research Division, at the Congressional Research Service. She was not ignorant about the field of UFOs, and classified research. Records show she had been involved in at least five UFO or SETI related investigations by the Congressional Research Service.
In 1976, just before Carter won the Presidential election Smith wrote "Extraterrestrial Intelligence and Unidentified Flying Objects: A Selected, Annotated Bibliography" for the Library of Congress Congressional Research Service.
In 1975 and then in a 1978 update, Marcia Smith joined with Dr. George Gatewood, Director of the Allegheny Observatory and the NASA Ames research Center SETI Program office, to write a report for the Congressional Research Service called "Life Beyond Earth." This paper (later turned into a book), was not about UFOs. "The paper is," wrote Smith, "instead, a synthesis of past and current thought on the possibility that there is extraterrestrial life in the universe, together with discussions of the possible impacts of making contact with it."
In 1976 Smith also co-authored a report called The UFO Enigma which was produced for the Congressional Research Service. The report was an overview of the U.S. government involvement in solving the UFO puzzle, and information that had been released under the Freedom of Information."
In 1983 Smith produced an updated report by the same name updating the report with events that had occurred between 1976 and 1983.
These CRS UFO related reports were very basic UFO reports with nothing of a controversial or classified nature. Part of the reason for this is that the reports were publicly published, and also the fact that UFOs was not a popular subject to be writing about inside the government
James Oberg, a former NASA consultant, worked in the 1970s with Marcia on Congressional research reports. Both had an interest in UFOs, but they also shared an interest in Oberg’s specialty - the Soviet space program. Aviation Week & Space Technology magazine eventually came to refer to Marcia Smith as "The Congressional Research Service Russian space guru."
Oberg recalled Smith’s reticence to writing reports on UFOs. "Back in the late 1970s," Oberg told this writer, "we briefly discussed the overview of ‘The UFO Enigma’ (written the year before Carter became President) and she expressed exasperation at having to put something like that together, but basically the CRS researches what Congress asks them to do. . ."
When the story broke that Smith had done two reports for President Carter in 1977, Oberg contacted this author and provided him with Marcia Smith’s E-mail so I could obtain her comment. Smith did not respond to the E-mail, but it appears that she and Oberg did discuss the two reports. In a second E-mail, Oberg wrote, "She is talking to me. Is she talking to you."
Asked what Smith had told him about the ETI and UFO studies, reportedly done by Smith in 1977, Oberg refused to say anything. A researcher out of Washington, D.C. wrote Oberg asking for smith’s phone number, but this request was also ignored. Oberg, always ready with an opinion about anything and everything, was forced to a position of complete silence.
The reason for this silence was the fact that anything Oberg would say pro or con would simply increase the pressure on Marcia Smith to confirm or deny the Sheehan recollections. Smith had no intention to talk, and Oberg planned to do what he could to help his long time friend.
Besides the high school level UFO - related reports listed by the CRS, as being authored by Marcia Smith, there were two that won’t be found listed in an CRS directory. Those two reports were the two 1977 reports requested by President Carter on extraterrestrial intelligence and UFOs. These two reports, according to Sheehan, were also written by Marcia Smith.

From Sheehan’s description of the reports, these two reports were no high school level reports. Sheehan had know of the writing of the two reports, due to his role as a special consultant for the CRS. Sheehan reported that he even was able to read the two reports before they were sent of to the Science and Technology Committee of the House of Representatives.
Sheehan’s role for the CRS was to help obtain the Vatican UFO files, and a second more dramatic role in reviewing classified UFO files from the former USAF Project Blue Book which was closed in 1969. This incident occurred in a vaulted room in the basement of the Library of Congress Madison Building in downtown Washington, D.C.
The new Carter administration had reinstated funding for the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence, and Marcia had phoned Sheehan asking him to speak to the scientists at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, in the SETI program. The topic of the presentation would be "the potential theological religious implications of potential contact with extraterrestrial civilizations." Sheehan qualified for this because of his degree in religion.
Sheehan reported that he told Smith, "Look if I am going to be doing this, which I am totally delighted to do, I would like to be able to get access to some of the data that you might have available in the course of your doing this investigation for the Science and Technology Committee in Congress."
Asked what data he would like, Sheehan stated he wanted to see "the classified sections of the Project Blue Book."
Marcia, according to Sheehan stated she didn’t know if she could get the Air force and defense department to release those files, but agreed to try. "She contacted them," recalled Sheehan, "and shortly thereafter she called me and she said, much to her surprise, ‘They have agreed to do this.’"
"She gave me a particular date and time and told me that I should go over to the new building at the Library of Congress," Sheehan stated, " this building had not even been opened yet. There were no people in it. She told me they are going to bring the files down to the new building...They had this big vault room downstairs."
Sheehan continued to tell what has now become a very controversial series of events that occurred two hours into the search. It is a story he told Marcia Smith just after it occurred, and a story he has told dozens of times since.
There was a room and these two security officers there at the door and there was actually a third, plain clothed, sitting at a desk to the right of them.
As I came in there I showed them all my identification, and they checked some documentation that they had, and said "Yes. I was supposed to be here."
As I started to go in, the man sitting at the desk told me I had to leave my briefcase there. I wouldn't be allowed to take any notes. It turned out I had a yellow pad under my arm, so I set the briefcase down, gave it to him, and I went into the room. I was in there for some time. There were a bunch of documents there. There was actually a film machine. It was like a little reel-to-reel - kind of a film machine there. I don't know if it was 35mm, or whatever those things were. So there was actually some little films there.
I looked at some of the films and they were like the classic films that you have seen, sort of far distant shots of strange moving vehicles. So I decided I wasn't making much headway on this, so I began to look into these little boxes, that had these canisters there. There was one of these overhead filmstrip machines that was sitting in the room. I began to take these little canisters out, and open them up, and put the filmstrips in and look through these things. I don't know how many I had gone through. I had gone through several, or at least a few of these boxes, when I hit upon this one canister that had film and pictures. I started going through, turning the little crank and there it was.
Again I have told people about this a number of times. There were these photographs of unmistakable - of a UFO sitting on the ground. It had crashed, apparently. It had hit into this field and had dug up, kind of plowed this kind of trough through this field. It was wedged into the side of this bank. There was snow all around the picture. The vehicle was wedged into the side of
this mud like embankment kind of up at an angle. There were Air Force personnel. As I cranked the little handle, and looked at additional photos, these Air Force people were taking pictures.
In the photograph they were taking photographs of this vehicle. One of the photos actually had the Air Force personnel with this big long tape measure measuring this thing. You could see that they had these parkas on, with little fur around their hoods. You could see that they had the little name tags on their jacket. They were clearly U.S. Air Force personnel.
I was kind of in this strange state saying, "Here it is!" So I turned the crank for more pictures, and I could see on the side of this craft these like little insignias - little symbols. So I turned ahead a couple of pictures to see if there was a closer picture. Sure enough there was. One of the photos had kind of a close-up picture of these symbols. So what I did is, I was getting nervous. I looked around, and the guys weren't watching or anything. They were outside of the room, so I took
the yellow pad, and I flipped it open to the little grey cardboard backing and I flipped it under the screen. I shrank the size of the picture to the exact same size as the back of the yellow pad, and traced the actual symbols out in detail, verbatim of what was there.
Once I had actually seen these pictures, and actually chosen to copy down and trace these symbols from this craft, I just decided that I should get out of there. So I got up closed the little pad, and I put the film back in the canister. I put all the boxes back where they were, and put the yellow pad under my arm, and just walked out. As I came through the door, I went over to get my briefcase up, and the man at the little desk that was sitting there pointed to the yellow pad under my arm, and he said, "What's that you've got there?"
I said,"That's the yellow pad that I had with me."
He said, "Let me see that." He reached out and I handed it to him. He flipped through the yellow pages, and never looked at the back, never looked at the inside cardboard backing, and handed it back to me. So, I just put it under my arm, got my briefcase and walked out of there. I took this with me, and I reported the details to Marcia. I also prepared my three hour seminar for JPL.
Marcia then drafted the two reports for the House Science and Technology Committee. "I ended up getting copies of the two reports," said Sheehan, "one on extraterrestrial intelligence, and the other on the phenomena of Unidentified Flying Objects.
"The first report on extraterrestrial intelligence," said Sheehan, "stated the Congressional Research Service of the official United States Congressional Library, in its official report to the President, through the House of Representatives Science and Technology Committee, concludes that there are from two to six highly intelligent, highly technologically developed civilizations in our own galaxy over and above our own."
"In the second report they had drawings of different shapes of UFOs that have been sighted," continued Sheehan. "They didn’t site any particular cases, but they said that they believed there was a significant number of instances where the official United States Air Force investigations were unable to discount the possibility that one or more of these vehicles was actually from one of these extraterrestrial civilizations. They put this together, and sent it over to the President. I ended up seeing a copy of it."
Sheehan’s contact with the CRS went only to Marcia Smith. It did not extend to Smith boss, Dr. Jack Gibbons. Sheehan told this writer that he was not even aware of whom Gibbons was. It is assumed that Gibbons knew, and approved of the UFO related reports that Smith was writing. This would extend to the secret UFO report prepared for the House of Representatives, and President Carter, if the story Sheehan tells is true.
This connection is important because following a long period as the head of the Office of Technological Assessment for the Congressional Research Service, Dr. Gibbons went on to become Assistant to the President for Science and Technology in the Clinton White House. As science advisor to President Clinton, Gibbons dealt with the Rockefeller White House UFO initiated by Lawrence Rockefeller. Despite his close relationship to the UFO investigations that were being conducted by Marcia Smith, during and just after the Carter administration, Gibbons strangely told Rockefeller in 1993, that he was totally ignorant of the UFO subject.
According to 1,000 pages of UFO documents released by the Clinton Office for Science and Technology Policy, Gibbons quickly overcame his claimed UFO ignorance. He not only met with Rockefeller and his representatives about UFOs, but he headed up a White House initiative to declassify documents that it was hoped would reveal the true story of the events surrounding the crash of an object near Roswell, New Mexico in July 1947.
Finally, in research to discovery if Smith produced a secret UFO report for President Carter, a strange discovery was made. As noted above, in 1976 Marcia Smith headed up a research report prepared by the Congressional Research Service titled "The UFO Enigma." Strangely, the very next year, 1977, a book using exactly the same title "The UFO Enigma" was published by Doubleday. The author was arch-debunker of UFOs, Donald Menzel.

STEP 3 - An independent reader of KEN's distorted and historically inaccurate hit piece rant against Alfred submits a documented list of Alfred's accomplishments, demonstrating Alfred is functionally is the OBVERSE of a NWO Illuminati operative.

To Alfred Lambremont Webre: A reader reminds us of all your positive efforts on behalf of us all . . my thanks for lending this perspective! Hugs, ~Jean

Posted on February 6, 2015by 
If anyone has been following your interviews, it would be almost laughably obvious you are not only maximally exposing the NWO but doing a great deal to take it down in functional way – as with helping set up the Transhumanist War Crimes Tribunaland the 9/ll War Crimes Tribunal (was ebola included as Part II of 9/11?), as with your having the largest single collection of work on ebola as a NWO genocide and coup plan (Ebolagate), as with providing a major spotlight on crimes against Charley Seven and mainstream media is acting as a mafia in stealing her (and others) intellectual property on a huge scale and using the proceeds to fund false flag, including 7/7 and Charlie Hebdo(Hebdo also meaning 7 (Sevengate), as with exposing the Mars colonies and their connection to Cheney and the plans to repopulate earth with hybrids, as with Captain Randy Cramer and Simon Parkes agreeing about ETs and where loyal military are on what’s happening, as with giving a platform to Emily Windsor Cragg, daughter of King Edward VIII who is accusing Elizabeth Windsor (who calls herself Queen) of treason, etc. etc. That you haven’t been tar and feathered for all of this is a wonder.
And anyone watching those videos would also recognize a mix of your humor and your encouragement in what you’re saying, as opposed to hard and fast predictions. You are not associated with “ascension” but with access to a range of truly remarkable people who are risking a great deal to report or do what they are, and with exposure of people like Annettor Tellinger, not through your own decisions about them but through letting people who have been lied to or bilked by them have a means to be heard because you offered them a forum. Who else has put out so much on ebola or the CDC being responsible for theTuskegee experiment and evidence the CDC is working with the CIA?
If you’re doing mind control, then it’s a new definition since you’re opening up so many areas of new thought, it’s not mind controlling but mind boggling. Who else is offering such an intellectual and political and expolitical feast of new ideas and new people, and with such good nature and with needed support to them, including helping them financial support.
If you’re working for the NWO, they seem to be having trouble with their hiring practices. Their HR department seems to have just seen SRI and missed your participating in and setting up additional War Crimes Tribunals for the NWO. Someone is going to lose their job for not noticing you’re not really helping NWO things move forward.
Life in the Slow Lane




Sign-up for RSS Updates:  Subscribe in a reader

Sign-up for Email Updates:

Delivered by FeedBurner

View and Share our Images
Curious about Stillness in the Storm? See our About this blog - Contact Us page.

If it was not for the galant support of readers, we could not devote so much energy into continuing this blog. We greatly appreciate any support you provide!

We hope you like this not-for-profit site 

It takes hours of work every day to maintain, write, edit, research, illustrate and publish this website from a small apt in Morocco, Africa.

Like what we do? Consider giving back, any amount helps!

[Click on Image below to Donate]

1 comment :

  1. After digesting all this; "he said she said diatribe", it all seems to get down to nothing more than egos. All parties involved here are all claiming to be doing something positive or some good for the common peons.

    I believe what we are witnessing here is what I've defined before in pervious comments. We are witnessing "variables" or "versions" of what people claim to be "the truth". As I keep saying; you can have 10 people witness a car accident and then ask them to describe what they experienced and you'll end up with 10 "versions" of the truth.

    How can anyone else claim another's version is untruthful unless they have been there side by side with them throughout their life or at the very least throughout any given event? Is God not experiencing itself through us all simultaneously?

    So unless one claims to be "the God", I suspect we will continue to get nothing more than "versions" of the "truth" from you-tube and article bloggers.

    In the end alI I hear is same old, "I'm right and your wrong" scenario. Which is really nothing more than egos battling it out among themselves.

    I suppose what we think about what others think about us, seems more important than the messages we bring to ourselves. To a large degree I believe this to be truthful. We still haven't gotten beyond not giving a shit about what others think about us, no matter what we say.

    Having an opinion, is just that, it's an opinion. The fact that so many of us are still travelling in the same path or direction seems to be a moot point these days and we are more interested and consumed in "who's" path were willing to travel on.

    Well seeing as nobody can possible know what it's like to be me or stand in my shoes, I choose to continue to be on my own one of a kind unique path, and it's all mine because no one else can own it.


SITS blog is a venue where Data we come across can be shared with all of you. If we look past personal bias, and distill the Absolute Data within each post, our natural intuition will assemble these nuggets together and reveal a greater truth.

We do not know what that truth is yet of course. We are discovering that together as a whole by sharing and discussing our unique perspective. Share your thoughts and we will all come to a greater understanding as one.

Support Stillness in the Storm