Tuesday, December 31, 2013

DNA's Absolute Tech: Is there Evidence DNA is used to Stabilize Star formation, Planets and Ecosystems?

The following 3 posts by Guthrie, are all very related to each other, so I'll post them in one block here. 

Guthrie discusses what David Wilcock, Dan Winter and so many other researchers have discovered, that DNA and its manifold emergences in the Universe are much more interconnected to our physical reality, gravity, and how our starry sky is held in balance. If you have never heard of Dan Winter and his research into Galactic History, and the Role of DNA, your in for a real treat because I find it some of the most fascinating correlative research; research that ties in multiple seemingly unrelated data points, into a cohesive dialog.  

When you begin to start your life as a truth seeker, and depending on how passionately you seek new data, you'll begin to see a framework for DNA, and our selves being laid out. Our would-be masters have long kept hidden from us our true history, and just how we interconnect to our mutual reality.  The following outlines well just how much data there is to support the notion that DNA is helping to stabilize our material creation via our spiritual and mindal BEing's and DOing's. 

See the post DNA and Gold (Key to Immortality?) If Human Energy Backs All Currency, Why Are They Hoarding Gold? for Dan Winters complete video on Galactic History and related evidence found. 

See the post Keys to Living - Positive and Negative Knowledge: Fearlessness, Self Mastery and Healing the body for Bruce Lipton's complete video on Biology of Belief and how this connects with the 2 types of manifestation.
- Justin

Source - Humanity InCorpOrate


I began reading "Experience and Nature" (John Dewey) this evening and came to a section that I felt needed to be expended upon, the conscious prioritization of experience.

I will begin with an introduction to the idea of Experiential and Natural entwinement. For many years we have, from a scientific and cultural standpoint, regarded our experience as trivial and separate in relation to the natural world, or as we have called it the "Objective" world. With the scientific data we have now to support that everything, down to our once thought to be "confined" and "interpersonal" emotions has a physical force or "Object" associated with it we are obligated as a global scientific culture to review our paradigms. For example, I will reference the "Emoto Water Experiments", in which Masaru Emoto had a variety of subjects interact with water as it crystallized with various intentions or emotions in mind. When the emotion applied was "loving" the water crystallized into very rigid, cohesive patterns. When "Hate" or rejection was applied, the structure was considerably more nebulous. This exemplifies the fact that the emotions that we have hold charge and thus that our "experience" does have repercussions in the "objective" world.

Now we must consider how emotions are built and refined. Emotions, initially, are built by basic stimulus, response. We experience an object and react without distillation, though on a fundamental level we are storing this experience in a "database" that we will draw from to form more refined emotional responses in the future. Through your initial experiences in the world you build a new aspect to your emotions, the filtration process. Once you have built your initial database of experience you begin to filter "new" experiences through the previous experiences that you have. This is the fundamental organization principle of the mind in action. Your brain takes an object that may be entirely new to your perspective and filters it through previous experience with like objects to form a comprehensive idea of what the object is in relation to the self.

In his book "Experience and Nature", John Dewey states that "It is not the experience that is being experienced, rather the object in focus." I would like to add another aspect to this statement. You are both experiencing your experience and experiencing the object in question. When you are intaking sensory data about an object you are filtering it through prior experiences in order to form a reference point for perception. Thus, you are factoring in and "experiencing" your previous experience while you are intaking the new data and forming a more complete understanding of the items significance to you. You are experiencing at all times, yourself. What are we more (perceptually) than a compilation of our experience? Think of this process like cognitive tessellation. You see an object initially and then in order to understand it in relation to the self you break it into multiple pieces that eventually through filtration accumulate the image again with your distinct "color" to it.

YOU and I

I was pacing around the pavement in front of my house a moment ago, in a thick plume of smoke and thought. I was running through a sequence of thoughts and came to a song that I remembered hearing during my prior occupation at the "Taco Bus", Ellie Goulding's "I need your Love". The lyric that was looping in my head was "I need your time". I thought about this for a moment and reviewed my recent experience with externalizing internal needs. Everything that you are externally is a reflection of an internal state, when she says "I need your time" what is really being said is I need MY time. She is seeking gratification in external validation, seeking to be fulfilled internally by an external phenomena.

As I see it the universe comes down (experientially) to a sequence of "You's" and 'I's" (hey yous guys...) Let's define quickly. You is representative of the external, "objective" world. I is representative of the internal, "subjective" world. In this system, for every you there is an I. For example, Lets say that you are interacting with a rock. The "I" experience would be how you choose to filter the data in order to lift the rock, linking all of the necessary points of experience to effectively experience the item within your sphere of understanding. The "You" experience (relative to this "I") would be the external effects of lifting this rock, the readjustment of sediment beneath to reform a structural equilibrium, the alternation in magnetic flux of the item in question, it's reconfiguration of self due to it's change in environment, e.t.c.

This "I" and "You" standard can be applied anywhere, even in inverse of the previous interaction. The rock in said situation also has a state of awareness, not HUMAN awareness but awareness none the less. As the rock exists it is constantly evolving, constantly changing from the base electro-magnetic level upwards to attenuate itself to the environment and thus the environment to itself.

I will now expand on this "co-evolution" principle of both the environment and the object evolving to attenuate to the needs of one another. Let's continue with the rock example, I think it works well due to unanimous consent that ROCKS ARE NOT CONSCIOUS, though through further review we can safely state that they are. The rock begins as sediment, individualized granules of matter and over time is compressed through natural forces to form rock. As this is occurring the external environment attenuates itself to the presence of the rock, life that was once rich during it's sedimentary stages moves away from the hardening rock formation. This creates an environment in which the sediment can harden much more freely to form a solid base for further sediment and life to develop upon. In this model you see the sediment bonding with itself to more sustainably suit the environmental conditions and the environment following suit to expedite the process of evolution on both sides of the spectrum. Both the object and it's environment change to suit the higher needs of one another.

We also see this very readily in the interactions of humans with their environment. The book "Botany of Desire" (Michael Pollan) does an excellent job exemplifying this phenomena of co-evolution. In his book he discusses the Apple, the Potato, the Tulip and Cannabis. In each exchange between humans and these plants both evolved (and continue to) considerably. The apple for example began as a rather bitter fruit, more resemblant of todays "Crab Apples", however, over years and years of interaction with humans it developed more appealing flavors to suit the need of it's consumer, us. When we began to see apples as an agricultural commodity we began to plant them EVERYWHERE. The crops with the least sapid flavor would be scrapped for fermentation or fertilization and the more desirable of the harvest would be jarred and eaten. Over time the trees acclimated to their new role and began producing a more tasteful product, this in turn provided us with an incredibly healthy dietary supplement and an abundant supply of it, this allows us comfortability in one region for an extended period and assists in the gestation of the mind or as we so enjoy calling it "domestication".

In conclusion, as you are evolving to fit your environment, your environment in turn is evolving to fit you. Everything is a sequence of You's and I's and for every You there is and must be and I.

If you would like to add any information I would be honored to hear it.


Initially a star system begins as a cloud of dust and debris gravitating towards a central point of gravity. Initially this debris would have been photons, or photonic in nature and through decrease in speed changed its orientation to fit the state of the space. As photonic material cools it will express itself as different "elements" that then through fusion and fission have come to be everything we see today. As has been posited in discourses by Dan Winter that light\photons accrete readily to DNA when provided with an environment for observation. That is not to say that this phenomena only occurs when isolated, quite the contrary, I am positing that perhaps DNA is what provides the conditions for gravity and this particulate accretions. Let us say that there is a "quantum" dna that exists within the universe, accreting photons and facilitating speed or frequency flux to in turn allow for "creation" or displays of self organization and evolution occur.

The DNA of the universe in my perspective can be expressed comprehensively as a "standing wave", or the undisturbed, idiosyncratic waveform representation of a space. The standing wave, then in essence contains all information about a space(confined unit of expression). Let us now say that the universe has a standing wave. The waveform that contains all of the information or all the activated potentials of a space, of its (the universal) space. As we see in DNA, different strands represent different expressions for behavior, working together in any number of combinations to activate response to an environment. Let us now look at galaxies, solar systems, planets even as expressions or individual "strands" in the DNA. The strands exist, physically, in quantized relationships from one another, but function as a whole to stimulate growth within the unified, universal self.

The cooled photonic material begins to gravitate towards the "nucleus" of the soon to be sun. The particulates begin to collide and heat creating higher speed motion of the components. Eventually this matter becomes too hot for themselves (baby) and the outer layers surrounding the central mass of this expand outwards due to the changing chemical composition of the particulates. The inner sphere contracts/implodes and forms a "black hole" to use readily accepted terminology. This "black hole" will now represent the center of gravity in this newly forming solar system. In higher what are referred to as "bliss states" of consciousness by Dan Winter, DNA is observed to inbraid and implode into itself, significantly resembling a black hole. If, Dan winters postulation about DNA being the primary component in matter building is indeed correct, this similarity will not be as arbitrary as it may seem.

Let us, perhaps, suspend our disbelief and assume that what caused the initial and continuing accretion of photons into what we view as matter was DNA of a quantum/universal level. We can apply this to our immediate experience on earth. Does not all "life" as we label it, base upon various and sundry configurations of DNA? Our bodies can be looked at simply as accretions of particulates surrounding and responsive to DNA. DNA seems to facilitate and expedite self organization.

Now that we have laid the basic groundwork I would like to expand on how I view the universe developing. Initially there was the "word". The WORD can be and is readily equatable to the vibratory foundation of our Uni-verse (one WORD). Let us apply the idea of the universal "standing wave". A standing wave in 3 dimensions of space looks exactly like dna.

Look at the 4th overtone for
reference to our double helix.

Now, look at the first harmonic, or the fundamental tone. Reasonably, every other derivation of this can be contained in this space. To provide an associatable example; If you were to record yourself standing in one space and moving your body in every possible way that you could from that point, then were to overlay each frame upon the next. You would see a dense ball of skin toned matter, you would look static. However, you are anything but. You are meeting every point of potential expression and to the observer SEEM to be static. This is how I view the "Standing wave" of the universe.

From this point we can move into how DNA expresses itself. Fundamentally, DNA is set in motion due to changes in the environment. When environmental signals change, the DNA moves to express itself to attenuate itself behaviorally to the new space. Let us look at this on a microcosmic level, the individualized cell. Firstly we must dispell the age old fallacy that Genes are the "brain" of the cell. The gene sequence or DNA in the nucleus of the cell contains "blueprints" for protein development and replenishment. When the nucleus of a cell is extracted the cell continues to function efficiently until the proteins eventually die and are in need of duplication in order to allow the cell to continue to function. As our current topic is DNA, I will bypass the complete anatomy of human cells but Bruce Lipton (Biology of Belief) does a wonderful series of seminars about the topic. Let us zoom our focus into the DNA. My understanding is that when an environmental signal is being experienced by the cell the dna produces the protein spectrum needed in order for the cell to conduct itself to accommodate to it's new environment in an equalized fashion. This would entail goal oriented self organization even on a most microcosmic of levels.

Let us now zoom out into our solar system. As stated before the previously photonic dust and matter accumulate into a star and continue to heat and accelerate until the threshold of expression is met and then expand outwardly and inwardly contract. This forms a new, strengthened center of mass in the space for the newly flung particulates to gravitate towards. These eventually accrete once more and expand again planets form, cycle repeat. There is a much more detailed explanation of this process done by Bruce Peret, in which he delves into KVK Nehru and Dewey Larsons "Reciprocal Theory of Matter". I am simply exemplifying another system displaying the goal oriented self organization on a larger scale.

I would now like to readdress how this "Quantum DNA" functions in theory. So, as stated before the dna produces protiens to respond according to environmental signals. In order for action to occur within the cell (or what can be equated to the universe in this diagram) there must be an ENVIRONMENT for it to interact with. I think instead of jumping to conclusion like "there are multiple universes!" or "We're Just a single cell in a greater cosmic being!" we should address how this would work consciously. Instead of another environment surrounding us, which would produce quite the quandry for everything that we hold dear, let us imagine the "Quantum DNA" being responsive to IDEAS.
The Universal DNA being reactive to ideas would make quite a bit of sense especially when tied in with the trinity aspect. The Father, the Idea, the thought. The mother, the matter, the filtration of the idea. The Son, the action, dynamic creation of the Bi-Aspect combination. If the "Quantum DNA" responds to Ideas like cells do "physical environments", it would obviously continue to display goal oriented self organization to fit the Idea at hand.





Support Stillness in the Storm

Sign up for Gaia TV

Sign up for Gaia TV
By signing up through this link you also support SITS